|
Title: The Ratings For Rose Post by: The Doc on August 19, 2012, 08:54:02 pm Here are the ratings for this story.
Overnights - 10.4m Officials - 10.81m Audience Share - 43.2% AI - 76 Title: Re: The Ratings For Rose Post by: The Cyber Mistress on August 20, 2012, 08:31:14 pm 76 isn't a good score, is it? Or is it?
Title: Re: The Ratings For Rose Post by: Vampyros Adric on August 22, 2012, 01:58:21 pm 76 isn't a good score, is it? Or is it? Recent episodes of Doctor Who have been getting AIs of high 80s but compared to Classic DW, 76 represents a very good performance. Those viewing figures are astonishing - I guess these were the days before Sky Plus and iPlayer had really taken hold. Title: Re: The Ratings For Rose Post by: Roranicus on August 26, 2012, 02:06:28 pm I think more than that though, there was a huge amount of people who were fans before, and even those who weren't who would have tuned in to see if they could pull it off, how different or the same it was, would it fall on it's face or even just what the fuss was about, because it came back to a mass of promotion. It's understandably high. The AI should have been better though.
Title: Re: The Ratings For Rose Post by: Aneurin on August 28, 2012, 11:29:21 pm I think Ror is probably right.
Title: Re: The Ratings For Rose Post by: Oh-Wise-One on August 30, 2012, 11:05:44 pm Title: Re: The Ratings For Rose Post by: Exterminate on September 07, 2012, 02:07:15 am The small jump from overnights to officials makes me laugh, especially when you consider the 2m+ we see these days |