5264
|
Travels In Time And Space / The 1960's / Re: A Tribute To The Second Doctor
|
on: November 24, 2010, 12:21:10 am
|
I've just been right through all his stories (audio at least) and it's tragic that more hasn't survived. The Second Doctor set the pattern of being a little less aloof from his companions than his predecessor had been and there were some very strong "families" in the Tardis during his time. A very fine series of stories.
|
|
|
5265
|
Travels In Time And Space / The 1960's / Re: A Tribute To The First Doctor
|
on: November 24, 2010, 12:13:33 am
|
Much as I love later Doctors, there's part of me that still regards Hartnell as the "real" Doctor. It was a brilliant characterisation, going from grumpy, even unpleasant, to utterly charming in seconds. Although perhaps the least comic of the Doctors, he handled humour wonderfully, and even had the Doctor's only on-screen romance till McGann.
|
|
|
5266
|
Travels In Time And Space / The Greatest Show In The Galaxy / Re: A Tribute To Your First Experience
|
on: November 24, 2010, 12:04:41 am
|
I watched An Unearthly Child 47 years ago today (glances at the clock - technically yesterday) and again the following week, because of the power cut. I was hooked from that point. I lost track a bit during the 80s because of various practical difficulties in watching (though I've made up for that now) and welcomed the new version enthusiastically, as well as Torchwood and SJA.
|
|
|
5269
|
Travels In Time And Space / The Greatest Show In The Galaxy / Re: Canon and 'The Reboot'
|
on: November 22, 2010, 12:43:31 am
|
I like having canon too, but it's always been a bit flexible. The Doctor's age, for instance, has varied from 450 to 749 to 900 to "thousands of years" without much rhyme or reason. The regens too have changed quite a bit. Originally, it was something the Tardis did when the Doctor's body got worn out, but there was no suggestion it happened after a traumatic death - in The War Games, no-one seemed to expect the War Chief to regenerate after he was shot (not that he'd have stood much chance if he did). I believe the maximum number of regens was first set at seven, then changed to thirteen in Mawdryn Undead.
I agree that there's no reason why we can't have a Fourteenth Doctor, but there needs to be a reason for it. Perhaps the Time War has changed things.
|
|
|
5275
|
Travels In Time And Space / Day Of The Moon / Re: Is this River Song?
|
on: November 21, 2010, 06:06:59 pm
|
I know who you mean - she directed Jack to the second Glove, and then he met her when he was back in Victorian times too. She was never really explained.
River obviously has travelled/will travel with the Doctor at some point, so she could theoretically be from any era. We've had companions settling down in different eras before (19th to 20th century, 25th century to late bronze age, 51st to 19th-21st century etc).
|
|
|
5277
|
Travels In Time And Space / The Crusade / Re: Another Writer Revealed
|
on: November 21, 2010, 05:53:57 pm
|
Matthew Graham is a fine writer and I actually think that his writing for MS's iteration of the Doctor will be more successful than 'Fear Her' was for DT. I actually didn't hate FH but it was by no means my favourite story. I also think that some writers adapt and grow into series. I wasn't mad keen on the Krotons but Bob Holmes went on to become arguably the most popular (certainly the most respected IMHO) of Classic Who writers. A writer with as high profile as Graham coming on board is another sign to me that Moff is set to unleash an amazing series 6 of Doctor Who upon us. I don't know how everyone else is feeling - and this is probably another post for another place - but with every passing spoiler I see, Season 6 is looking more and more impressive. Bring it on!!!!
I don't think there was anything much wrong with the writing in the Krotons, just a crap monster design. Fear Her was OK - not a classic, but certainly not one I'd be tempted to skip if I'm watching through the series.
|
|
|
5280
|
Travels In Time And Space / The Invasion Of Time / Good and bad cliffhangers
|
on: November 20, 2010, 09:54:55 pm
|
The cliffhanger was a vital part of the classic series, sometimes done brilliantly, sometimes... not so brilliantly. Let's have some thoughts about the best and the worst.
A couple of my contenders for best:
Episode 1 of The Daleks - just for sheer classicness, you can't beat that view down the eyestalk of Barbara cowering from the still-unseen menace.
Episode 1 of The Caves of Androzani - brilliantly written. We actually see the Doctor and Peri killed, yet the solution doesn't feel remotely like cheating. Everything's been set up, so when it's revealed it seems inevitable.
And for the worst, I give you the cliffhanger that goes from The Rescue into The Romans, with the Tardis toppling over the cliff. Then... nothing. We don't see any effect it has on the Doctor or his companions, there are no consequences and it has nothing whatsoever to do with the story that follows. Huh?
|
|
|
|
|