The Doctor In The TARDIS
April 20, 2024, 06:41:18 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Check out all the spoilers from Series 7 in our dedicated spoiler section
 
  Home Help Gallery Doctor Who News Facebook Group FAQ's Staff List Calendar Members Login Register  

Too reliable on continuity?

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Too reliable on continuity?  (Read 574 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Nyki
Guardian Of Gallifrey
****
Favourite Doctor: Jon Pertwee
Favourite Companion: Leela
Posts: 5334



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Third year Anniversary 5000 Posts Second year Anniversary
« on: May 28, 2011, 05:58:03 pm »

Yes, I agree with TDD too.  Through the 60s and 70s (especially in the first couple of years) there was a definite thread of character development, but the stories themselves were very much discrete entities.  There wasn't even that much recurrence during the 60s - during the whole period of the first two Doctors, the only monsters who recurred were the Daleks, the Cybermen, The Yetis/Great Intelligence and the Ice Warriors, and the only non-companions who reappeared were the Monk, Professor Travers and Lethbridge Stewart.  Most of even these didn't happen till the later 60s.  I'd say they were pretty good at giving enough background info for a new viewer without boring the regulars.
Report Spam   Logged




Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Administrator | Global Moderator | RP Moderator | Role Player
| Member Of The Month
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy