The Doctor In The TARDIS
March 28, 2024, 11:45:20 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Head over to 76 Totters Lane and check out all the latest merchandise
 
  Home Help Gallery Doctor Who News Facebook Group FAQ's Staff List Calendar Members Login Register  

Too reliable on continuity?

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Too reliable on continuity?  (Read 562 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
The Pandorica Master
Easily Exterminated
*
Favourite Doctor: Tenth Doctor
Favourite Companion: Rory Williams
Posts: 61


"You shall bring forth...Sssilence!"


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Topic Starter Multiple Badge Holder Level 2
« on: May 28, 2011, 02:23:00 pm »

We're in a Century where there's such a creation as the BBC iPlayer [Thank God!]. Meaning, if you've got that Weekly Shop to do or Relatives to meet on a Saturday, you can still watch your Favourite Shows.
But, my questions is this. Do you think, for the viewers, the Classic Era was TOO RELIABLE on continuity? Bearing in mind each episode was only shown once until VHS, it'd be impossible for a person who'd missed Mawdryn Undead to understand Terminus. And, it'd be impossible for someone who'd missed The Keeper of Trakken to understand Logopolis.
Do YOU think it was too reliable on Continuity?
Report Spam   Logged

TheDoctorDonna
Timelord
****
Favourite Doctor: Eleven/Two
Favourite Companion: Donna/Barbara
Posts: 3116


Whatchoo Lookin' At?


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Super Poster 50 Posts in one day Super Poster 25 Posts in one day Level 5
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2011, 02:46:27 pm »

Have you personally seen those stories? Because while there is some strong continuity in them (as well as many others), I would say that they are more than watchable if you haven't seen the others you mentioned. While there may have been things that the casual viewer might not understand, it wouldn't be 'impossible' to follow as you imply. The stories themselves are pretty straightforward.

Continuity only really became an issue in the mid to late 80's. The show became widely wrapped up in itself during that time, partially due to JNT trying, rightfully or not, to cater to and impress everyone. But, by the time this was in full swing DW was already available on VHS and many people were recording it off the TV anyway. The older stories, many of which are lost now so cannot be watched again to catch up on, didnt really follow a strong continuity. They were more about telling a story and you could dip in on any random story and be pretty much up to speed on what was going on in the larger narrative, because there wasn't really a larger narrative.

The thing is, DW is still quite self referential even today. Fans, like the people on here, will go out and buy the DVD's and whatnot, whereas casual viewers are less likely to do that and so they will still only see that 'one viewing' so plot points like River Song or the cracks in time would be equally as lost on them if they are dipping in and out as they would be if they were watching during the classic era.

So no, on the whole I don't think it's too reliable on continuity Smiley
Report Spam   Logged


One! One word! Shake, milk-shake, milk! Milk! No? Not milk! Um, shake, shake, shake! Cocktail shake! What, d'you want a Harvey Wallbanger?
Oh-Wise-One
Faithful Companion
***
Posts: 2119



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Super Poster 25 Posts in one day Level 5 Apple User
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2011, 05:35:53 pm »

I have to say, I totally agree with TFD. I think he has it pretty spot on
Report Spam   Logged
Nyki
Guardian Of Gallifrey
****
Favourite Doctor: Jon Pertwee
Favourite Companion: Leela
Posts: 5334



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Third year Anniversary 5000 Posts Second year Anniversary
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2011, 05:58:03 pm »

Yes, I agree with TDD too.  Through the 60s and 70s (especially in the first couple of years) there was a definite thread of character development, but the stories themselves were very much discrete entities.  There wasn't even that much recurrence during the 60s - during the whole period of the first two Doctors, the only monsters who recurred were the Daleks, the Cybermen, The Yetis/Great Intelligence and the Ice Warriors, and the only non-companions who reappeared were the Monk, Professor Travers and Lethbridge Stewart.  Most of even these didn't happen till the later 60s.  I'd say they were pretty good at giving enough background info for a new viewer without boring the regulars.
Report Spam   Logged


Twisted-Sister
Faithful Companion
***
Posts: 1786



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Super Poster 50 Posts in one day Super Poster 25 Posts in one day Poll Voter
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2011, 03:58:37 pm »

I think, as is pointed out above, for the most part there is very little continuity in the classic series. I think if anything, it is the new series which is more reliant on continuity. It expects the fans to be too. So much of what goes on in the last 2 series for example would be so easy to overlook if you weren't paying enough attention
Report Spam   Logged

Roranicus
Global Moderator
Timelord
*****
Favourite Doctor: Eleven
Favourite Companion: Rory
Posts: 4677


Rory FTW


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Third year Anniversary Search Super Poster 50 Posts in one day
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2011, 05:33:33 pm »

I've been using TIQ on the forum to catch up on the classics because I would say I had probably seen about 5% of them beforehand, but watching them in there, totally out of order, hasn't hindered the experience. There are stories that we have watched that have had both direct and indirect links to other stories, but having only seen perhaps one story and not the other hasn't left me any more confused about what has been going on than I suspect it might if I was watching in order.

As others have said, its moreso in the new series that continuity and canon have come into play a lot more. I think Series 5 and 6 especially have been heavy on continuity and dipping in and out of them would leave me a lot more confused. The only way I think you could get really lost with the classics is not tuning in for every part of the story, but that's not really a continuity problem. You'd be just as lost if you chose to read random chapters of a book, so stuff like that is to be expected.
Report Spam   Logged

Oh my god Karen, you can't just ask someone why they're white!
Davros
Tin Dog
*
Favourite Doctor: Sylvester McCoy (7th)
Posts: 185


Tar Lubeck ka'leed Uth Ricta Dal'ek.


View Profile WWW
Badges: (View All)
Topic Starter Multiple Badge Holder Level 2
« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2012, 03:07:24 am »

Nah, I don't think I was ever confused when jumping all around classic. Stories with recurring characters never bothered me. Sometimes I was even bummed out when they didn't refer back like Arc of Infinity didn't refer to The Three Doctors.

No, it's the two parters, season finales, and series 6 of new Who that's hard to watch without context.
Report Spam   Logged

Today, the Kaled race is ended, consumed in a fire of war. But, from its ashes will rise a new race. The supreme creature. The ultimate conqueror of the universe. The Dalek!
lastofthejagaroth
Easily Exterminated
*
Favourite Doctor: Jon Pertwee
Favourite Companion: Ace
Posts: 95


The centuries that divide me shall be undone!


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Apple User Level 4 Signature
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2015, 03:15:04 pm »

Based on what I've heard from online, it depend solely on who you were. I'm sure some lapped it up and some were plenty ticked-off. I don't have a huge problem with it, unless it's in an already bad story (COUGH Resurrection of the Daleks COUGH). Some people say it only started in the mid-80's but it really started with the Doctor's speech in The Massacre of St Batholomew's Eve, where he mentioned EVERY SINGLE ONE OF HIS COMPANIONS. We also got a flash-back sequence in Logopolis and The Three Doctors was purely a celebration of Doctor Who history. In short, I think it is a bit annoying but not annoying enough to bother me if it's in a good story, like Remembrance of the Daleks.
Report Spam   Logged

The Doctor: "You're Mr Thick Thick Thickety Thickface from Thicktown, Thickania. And so's your dad."
Nyki2
Earthling
**
Posts: 323


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
One year Anniversary Level 3 Poll Starter
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2015, 12:49:04 am »

Resurrection a bad story? Seriously? I love that one. Now Revelation of the Daleks - that I find really weak.

Personally I love it when we get back-references. Then again, I've been watching it since the beginning, so it doesn't confuse me.
Report Spam   Logged
lastofthejagaroth
Easily Exterminated
*
Favourite Doctor: Jon Pertwee
Favourite Companion: Ace
Posts: 95


The centuries that divide me shall be undone!


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Apple User Level 4 Signature
« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2015, 05:53:30 pm »

To Nyki2:
I would like to name some reasons I find Resurrection of the Daleks to be a bad story, if you don't mind:
1. It is virtually plotless.
2. So. Much. Graphic. Violence.
3. A very sadistic Doctor (he blows up Daleks with bombs and releases the Mollevian Virus, while making a James Bond-esque quip.)
4. Ridiculous-looking hats.
5. Endless technobabble mumbo-jumbo.
6. Plotholes that are, to me, more interesting than the actual "plot." (my favorite being the fact that Stien behaves like a rebel, despite the fact that he's a Dalek agent... even when he's alone!)
7. The brilliance of Michael Wisher's Davros is gone, giving way to a bland looney, who takes glee in ranting every line.
8. Also do the Daleks even have an evil plot?

When it comes to Revelation of the Daleks, I think it's a so-so story. It's not Colin Baker's best, which I consider to be The Trial of a Time Lord:Mindwarp, but it's not the worst. It's got some good ideas and wonderful music but also some bad acting and a weak plot. Also, that Glass Dalek is SO COOL! Still, everyone's entitled to their opinion.
Report Spam   Logged

The Doctor: "You're Mr Thick Thick Thickety Thickface from Thicktown, Thickania. And so's your dad."
lastofthejagaroth
Easily Exterminated
*
Favourite Doctor: Jon Pertwee
Favourite Companion: Ace
Posts: 95


The centuries that divide me shall be undone!


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Apple User Level 4 Signature
« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2015, 04:04:19 pm »

Upon thinking about it, I realized that the first example was in the 3rd story, The Edge of Destruction (or Inside the Spaceship; whichever you prefer), where Barbara mentions the Cave of Skulls and the Daleks, from the two previous stories. I'm not 100% sure it counts, however, since those episodes happened only a few weeks back, so it still may have been fresh in the viewing public's mind.
Report Spam   Logged

The Doctor: "You're Mr Thick Thick Thickety Thickface from Thicktown, Thickania. And so's your dad."
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Administrator | Global Moderator | RP Moderator | Role Player
| Member Of The Month
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy